System and Method for Learning Ranking Functions on Data

By · · Reviewed by the Nizam SEO War Room editorial team.

First, the short version. Below is the AIO-eligible passage and the question-format primer for System and Method for Learning Ranking Functions on Data.

  1. First, read the definition above — it's the answer most search and AI engines extract first.
  2. Second, scan the question-format H2s to find the specific facet you came for.
  3. Third, follow the patent + related-entry links at the bottom to map the dependency graph around System and Method for Learning Ranking Functions on Data.

What is System and Method for Learning Ranking Functions on Data?

Patent overview Inventor Christopher J.

Patent overview Inventor Christopher J.

NizamUdDeen, Nizam SEO War Room

Patent overview

Inventor
Christopher J. C. Burges, others
Assignee
Microsoft Corporation
Patent number
US App 11/462,932
Filing or grant year
August 7, 2006
Patent family
learning-ranking-functions
Track
Christopher Burges, Microsoft Research Learning-to-Rank Patents
<\/section>

What this patent covers

~30 unique US inventions (84-entry WIPO corpus) by Christopher J. C. Burges, the Microsoft Research scientist who invented the RankNet/LambdaRank/LambdaMART learning-to-rank lineage. RankNet (US 7,689,615) is the pairwise neural ranker; LambdaRank (US 7,617,164) is the arbitrary-cost extension that optimizes NDCG; LambdaMART (US 12/032,697) is the gradient-boosted ensemble that won the Yahoo LTR Challenge 2010. Also covers behavioral-variability adaptation, web-page multi-graph analysis, link-spam smoothing, margin-tree boosting, k-NN probability estimation. Spans 2001 to 2019. Co-authors include Robert Ragno (LambdaRank), Irina Matveeva, Timo Burkard.

<\/section>

Why System and Method for Learning Ranking Functions on Data matters

This patent is part of the Christopher Burges, Microsoft Research Learning-to-Rank Patents research track inside the Nizam SEO War Room patents archive. It describes a piece of the search-engine machinery that working SEOs need to understand to optimize against modern ranking and retrieval systems. A deeper annotated walkthrough of this patent — covering the claims, the disclosure, the prior art it cites, and the algorithms it influences — is queued for the next archive expansion pass.

<\/section>

Related research

Patents in the Christopher Burges, Microsoft Research Learning-to-Rank Patents track are cross-linked to neighboring tracks where the same inventor or research lineage continues. Read this patent alongside the other entries in the track to recover the full research arc — the original disclosure, its continuations and divisional applications, and any follow-up patents that branched from the same line of work.

<\/section>

For example, a working SEO consultant uses System and Method for Learning Ranking Functions on Data when diagnosing a ranking drop, planning a content calendar, or briefing a client on why a tactic shifted. However, the concept only compounds when paired with the surrounding entries in the encyclopedia and patents archive. In addition, the platform connects this concept to live SERP data so the theory carries through to execution.

How does System and Method for Learning Ranking Functions on Data work in modern search?

The full breakdown is in the article body above. In short: System and Method for Learning Ranking Functions on Data ties into how search engines and AI answer engines weigh signals — every detail (definition, ranking impact, related patents, related signals) is captured in this article and cross-linked to neighboring entries in the encyclopedia and patents archive.

Working SEOs reach for System and Method for Learning Ranking Functions on Data when diagnosing why a page ranks where it does, when planning a content strategy that aligns with the surfaces search engines and answer engines weigh, and when explaining ranking moves to non-technical stakeholders. The concept is one piece of the broader Semantic SEO + AEO operating system; the Nizam SEO War Room platform ties it to live SERP data, the patent lineage that introduced it, and the strategy moves that compound across projects.

Where System and Method for Learning Ranking Functions on Data fits in the Semantic SEO + AEO stack

Search engines have moved from keyword matching toward semantic understanding, entity reasoning, and AI-mediated answer generation. System and Method for Learning Ranking Functions on Data sits inside that shift — its weight, its measurement, and its downstream effects all changed when the underlying ranking and retrieval systems changed. Read the related encyclopedia entries linked above for the surrounding context.

Article last reviewed
2026
Related encyclopedia entries
cross-linked inline
Related patents
linked at the bottom of the body
Knowledge base size
1,449 encyclopedia entries · 882 patents · 33 locales

Sources and related research

The concept of System and Method for Learning Ranking Functions on Data is grounded in the search-engine research lineage tracked in the Nizam SEO War Room platform. Primary sources:

Related encyclopedia entries and patent walkthroughs are linked inline above. The Strategy Brain inside the platform connects these sources to live project state so the research has a direct execution surface.

Finally, to summarize. System and Method for Learning Ranking Functions on Data matters because it intersects directly with the signals search engines and AI answer engines use to rank and surface results. The full article above covers the mechanism in depth, the patents it derives from, and the related encyclopedia entries to read next.